70

Continuing from the preceding post:
The second half of Changeling was not as impressive to me as the first in the acting of the main Character.

In addition to this, one day I may also bring both The Help and The Iron Lady at the same time for closer comparison to see if I can find why the later took the award for best actress as the main character. 

69

Next to the wining of oscar for best actor held in 2016 in not understanding it or seeing some potential level I could be missing to understand it, comes that of the one held in 2000.

Also, although oscar held in 2009 shows a bloody fight for best actress nomination in which some of the nominations might be better than some winners of other years, based on the half of Changeling I have seen yet, I wondered how could anyone top that? I did not have the same feeling when I saw The Reader. 

Also one wonders why "the dying girl" in Me Earl And The Dying Girl and the character narrating the story in Mistress America were not nominated.       

68

Continuing from the preceding post 

I have my driver licence since 1994. Do you think that throughout all this period I remember even once being asked for alien number or citizenship certificate number when making or renewing it?

Still that would have been more tolerable if it were not about an entity asking for numbers all of them uniquely and permanently identify that person and already made by that same entity. How often have you seen something like this if at all? Aside from the issue of hardship, if I were a congress member I would seek to make the executive branch explain this because it suggests a risk of incompetency the like of which I have not seen before where a computerized system is used and my faith in that branch capability is not enough to make me assume a good reason here risking not acting on such sign.  

67

Continuing from the preceding post

You give them your social security number, you still have to give them the number of your citizenship/naturalization certificate and then again your alien number. While they did not ask for this, remember that your age also needs to be driven from date of birth and does not come ready. One day somebody will make a machine that would automatically calculate and search for things like these.

By the way, is 16 years with nobody asking about that number there long enough for the statuary limitation to expire on getting your citizenship certificate?

66

I talked about this before.The Healthcare.gov website asks for the number of certificate of citizenship (or whatever you call it for a naturalized citizen like me). I have been a citizen since 2000 and never once asked for that number. So what does that tell about the government? It is not like they are still using paper records and get tired of numerous retrieval of information. The government cannot extract one unique number through another unique number and both of them generated by it? As if this is not enough by itself, you have the demand for it suddenly appear like this. So what happened to all the checking on the data before this? They ask to be helped with this information as if the rest of the data is held by the government of France. The government whose job is keeping the data, wants me to help it with my record keeping for a paper it itself generated and gave to me 16 years ago and was never asked for it anywhere before this. This reminds me of dependency on external papers in governments like that of Saddam's Iraq.    

And if this still not ridiculous enough, get this, they also want the alien number. At least when I exclude applications at the level of green card and citizenship, I don't remember being ever asked for this number other than once after coming here to make the social security card in 1992.    

Although I may do like past years and buy my insurance externally, this is still a big joke. 

65

continuing from the preceding post

If I were a manufacturer of those things and worried about the effect of not following such restriction in order to get some certification for my product I could explain that to the customer and say if you think you need to be protected from yourself not to be allowed to increase the heat temperature of your own hot-tub then you may need to consider other brands.   

64

I recently took a look at spas and hot-tubs and found that it appears that they preset these at a maximum of 105 F degree. This is maybe one of the reasons that drive people crazy or toward guns or drugs. Even this simple enjoyment had to be spoiled. How good is this over protection that does not even just warren you or add precautions but disable things completely. What else people should be disabled from the capability to do for their protection? Drinking their bleach by selling them quantities enough for individual chores?

You can buy a gun and make others responsible for your choice if you miss use it but you cannot set your hot-tub to higher than 105.

    

62

In the preceding post, my mentioning for that movie from the other nominated movies was not based on a comparison I did that made me feel it the weakest.

61

So Joy gets nominated for Oscar's best actress category but Far From The Madding Crowd film of 2015 does not? Although probably not at the level of giving best actor to whom it went, I wonder if this was also the result of corrupt control and manipulation.

60

I just want to know, are there really people complaining about a law that requires picture ID for voting? How hard is it to do that? That is especially true if there is a long enough period for early voting that can be used if one fears he could forget in the main day of voting. It seems a very valid requirement and I wonder what that court argued against it. Why would one want a privileged treatment for something he can do that easily and with that gives the excuse for a privilege against him in a more serious thing? Those suing for such things remind me when a news man told the former president or his press secretary before the war in Afghanistan that Muslims (or some Muslims) think (or say or said) only God can give "Ultimate Justice" (or something like that) and apparently because of that made the white house changed the name to "Enduring Freedom".

59

I don't know if I should call this adulthood crises based on the behavior. There are movies about well- known characters that sound more like a child fantasizing about a heroic figure than a real story. I first thought that was just an exception when I noticed it in the Lincoln movie with the sever deficiency of material before seeing it yesterday again with the recent movie about Steve Jobs. I felt that despite how generally I watch movies mainly for the acting.       

58

I wonder if there is a considerable number of people who think that winning the best actor award of the most recent Oscar was not a corruption joke. Actually, contrary to the case for the best supporting actor for the same movie, it is very hard to see how even a nomination in this category was deserved or close to that.

Anyway, I was contemplating re-watching some of the "winner" nominated movies to see why I feel so far from sensing the quality of his acting. Now I feel relieved from that because this "win" tells me that I probably did not miss a big thing there.

   

57

Saw "The Revenant". Based on his portrayal of the main character I would rather see a bear attacking DiCaprio at the end. Even his body language did not always seem to fit. There is a scene in which he was sitting like a guy who had just finished a computer work or at most a day of labor work after what was supposed to be a near death exhaustion.   

56

continuing from post 54

I don't remember any of those throwing salt and pepper from high cooking shows coming even close to give something like the method in that link for frying eggplants, which I was looking for knowing how to do, or anything similar in benefit to me. Following the instructions there and paying special attention to the degree of heat and the amount of oil in the skillet may make one fry eggplants like a professional. I used to ignore the importance of the amount of oil until I realized how it could be that both the degree of heat and the amount of heat affect how fast the whole surface of the food in the skillet can reach the required change and therefore how much absorption of oil can happen during that time.

It seems that incorporating induction cooking in the frying process could improve it by not only preventing unnecessary absorption of oil but also preserving as much as possible the quality of an oil from unnecessary higher heat with its controlled temperature. I intend to combine the use of induction cooking with the use of extra virgin olive oil for frying.

55

Also about eggplants. This may be like telling people in other countries that you can boil eggs but here it may be needed. If you think fried eggplants taste good try this simple added step and see the difference it makes. Just simmer the fried eggplants with some water and, for example, a table spoon of oil and some seasoning if you prefer, like turmeric or curry, until the water dries to your satisfaction. That could be served with salad and/or yogurt and bread. 

54

This woman is my pick for the president position if THIS works. Because if you defeat the eggplants absorption of oil when fried no enemy can stand a chance.

53

By the way, how did Justice Scalia die? If it was something like a brain clot, I felt developing the same thing the few times I heard Justice Breyer's talk over the internet, trying to figure out his point. 

52

They talk about the Supreme Court lacks being of nine votes. Do you mean that Justices Scalia and Thomas were counted as two?

51

If anyone wonders why I use two Ids for posting the answer is that did not happen by choice. The one here was the only one but Google Plus messed up the things for me. 

50

I think that the baby and especially the newborn or infant may feel danger from anything that to him doesn't look sufficiently under the control of the parent. So if a parent decides to bring, for example, a cat to the baby it would make a big difference keeping the cat held by the parent instead of letting it roam freely around the baby. 

48

So now it appears there is this thing of throwing a baby in water in order to teach it how to float. How sure is it that we are not witnessing outrageous craziness being justified? Why the responsibility of the parents being shifted to the baby and for, to say the least, such a risky trade off? The younger the baby is the more irreversible the psychological damage that happen to it if it comprehend or feel a danger to its existence. I once saw on TV a mother letting a cat near her baby, which looked at least somewhat uncomfortable, and wondered what internal damage that could lead, let alone leaving it to itself to face surviving the danger of drowning in water. The protection of parents to their baby is not just from the danger but also from the feeling of danger. I remember reading a professional in the field giving example about how even a buzzing wasp in the room where the baby is could cause a psychotic damage in that regard. I think that, in addition to other things, even a little bit look of discomfort or disconcert on the baby should never be ignored as a signal that a baby is sensing danger in its environment.          

47

When the court in Florida sent me a photocopy of the sealed (stamped) summons I wondered how could that be allowed. With the one in New York, on the other hand, it appears that it was not part of its action against my case that it doesn't even send the plaintiff a photocopy of a sealed summons but a general practice. I don't know what kind of interpretation to FRCP Rule 4 allows that? If a court follow the law like that what would you expect from the ordinary person? Do those courts need more things dependent on their judgments that they crave the authority on something that much sitting on the borderline between the legislative and judicial authority like the first initiation of a law suit?

RULE 4  states that a summon "must" contain a seal and the clerk's signature? Do you see in that any possible interpretation that it could carry only the photocopy for those things, let alone the absences of a seal altogether? Neither it seems that Rule 1 gives a free pass for doing that through its application of justice, speed and inexpensiveness in the implementation of the rules.

The only seal the one in New York send is on one summons that the defendant never see and is only there to be returned to the court with proof of service. As if when the corresponding part of Rule 4 was made the main concern was how to make the summons in a way that shows its authenticity to the court that issued it in case it forgot and has no record of its own actions.  

  

  

46

Continuing from post 43

Actually, regarding the issue of guns and second amendment specifically, for all the judges in that court without exception, I in fact wish that whatever they do and did in my situation with the corruption guy here, they would have done no less had I not took the stand I took in that issue. 

45

continuing from the receding post 

Although having all those oils seem to change color more like instantaneous reaction and not in varying levels could suggests that what I described may not be a direct result to how much those oils were damaged. 

One  could heat the extra virgin olive oil and see if it will react similar to those other oils when swished in the mouth later. That still may not resolve the issue even for just the heating effect because there seems to be some disagreement on how much heat extra virgin olive oil can take.  

44

What is in the conventional cooking oil one buys from the grocery stores? How much do they change, or better to ask, how much do they remain the same and still could be called by their names after processing? 

In addition to what is I already know about the effect of heat on polyunsaturated fat, what brought those questions back with vengeance to my mind is something I noticed lately. I have been, for couple of weeks now, trying to practice the oil pulling method of regularly swishing oil in the mouth for 20 minutes or more. I started with extra virgin olive oil so that at least it is the of best healthy choices in case I swallow some of it. Many sources over the internet, including from dental professionals, say that you should see the oil turns milky white after you spit it out. However, no matter how long I kept that oil in my mouth it never turned to a white color or anywhere close to that. One day I noticed that I am about to run out of olive oil so I decided to use canola oil until I go shopping. To my surprise this one did turn milky white. Initially I hoped that I improved myself to this level or that it could be a question of viscosity. Later I tried safflower, corn and vegetable (soybean) oils with similar results. I went back to the extra virgin olive oil and it still looked as yellow as it gets after being spitted out. On the other hand those other oils seems to turn that white within seconds of swishing them or even immediately.This made seeing what those other oils do as a chemical reaction unavoidable. It also makes one wonder, with this level of different reaction how much could those processed oils affect the body differently. 

For the oil pulling practice itself, what is even stranger is that no matter how much I searched about it and the number of sites stating that milky color as indication for the effectiveness of the process, I  found no mentioning of what I described here.        

43

Isn't it impressive how much republicans can tolerate criticism and get hammered for their issues? The corruption guy here appears to have been trying for sometime to make me talk, and later to use my silence, about issues related to the judges identified more as democrats in the Supreme Court in order to show moral compromising from me in order to please them. What impresses me is how much those who are identified more to have republican views are generally taken for granted to accept criticism that I got no sign that he tried a similar thing toward the judges who belong to that group in that court. For example, he tried to use silence from me toward an abortion issue he manufactured for that purpose but I don't think he came anywhere close to use my long silence and much lower activity on the second amendment issue for the same purpose.

And, by the way, why is there so much concentration on how much Fox News show republican party views as if it is not overwhelmingly countered by generally every other network?   

42

The actress playing the main character in Jane The Virgin TV Series seems to ordinarily deliver what could be used to demonstrate acting in text books teaching it. 

41

continuing from post 30

If those evaluating acting are doing it naturally then what I am going to say here could be just a rationalization. But as much as what seems to me as extremism in demanding the absence of the actor in the portrayed character is influenced by things like the conclusion reached HERE then they could be missing things limiting themselves to see an entire dimension by only looking at it through the other one or at least a prematurely reached whole. Instead of that definition, I view acting more as being related to the existence of the portrayed character minus the existence of the actor. Yes, the addition to the second of those two could be much more damaging than a lacking in the first but that should still be within limit and not be taken as free pass on conservative acting. 

    

40

Speaking about Muslim women, I once was watching on Fox News Channel a show in which they were talking about countries in which women reached the top of leadership. I thought OK lets test the fairness and see if they would mention that two of the most populous Muslim nations, including the most populous one, which are Indonesia and Pakistan had woman at the positions of president and prime minister respectively. The later, Benazir Bhutto, even used to appear with hijab clothes. But despite the low number of cited examples one probably could have only dreamt that things like headscarf and hijab would not limit their minds from seeing those two nations. I also do not think it is likely things would have been different on a different network.

By the way, speaking about Benazir Bhutto I can hardly remember any announcement of findings related to investigating her assassination and despite the closeness in time to the election and the potential for her and her party to win again. It was as if her blood went like nothing. She was granted amnesty by Musharraf but was assassinated very shortly after she returned to Pakistan.

39

I want to emphasize that my talk about the right of some people to do or have something should not by itself imply recommending (neither does this statement imply recommending not doing or having) that thing and this include my talk in the posts below about the wearing of headscarves.     

38

I just want to know if anyone had complained to Microsoft about how hard it is to find a way to maximize a window for them to punish us inhumanely with this thing of a window gets maximized on its own every time you bring one to the corner trying to manage your space? 

37

continuing from the preceding post 
If you go to Australia you would see, I heard, that when you flush the toilet water will spin in the opposite direction. And  apparently if you go to France you would see that the separation of church and state works like THAT .

36

continuing from the preceding post 

Speaking, in post 34, about inferring the religious connection, what if a person wearing a cross hides it from the view by inserting it beneath his shirt or sweater? Would that still be illegal under that law ( LINK ) just because of the knowledge that the visible part of the chain around his neck is connected to a cross?

Also, like I said earlier, unlike a cross or a yamaka or a crescent, things like the headscarf do not have any significance in themselves in Islam. Therefor the manifestation of religious affiliation in these things is based merely on the uniformity that is created by wearing them. But that uniformity is the result of sharing a similar purpose (preventing being seen by males) and is not the result of deciding to share an outfit. Therefore the law does not apply on things like the wearing of headscarf by Muslim girls because the persons wearing those things did not decide to make the uniformity in outfit which led to the manifestation of religious affiliation.

A thing that could illustrate how the uniformity in wearing those things here was not decided by those wearing them appears if one imagine replacing them. For example the headscarf could be replaced with a bike helmet or a hood without affecting the religious function for which the headscarf is being generally used.  

35

continuing from the preceding post 

One could also say that the headscarf is worn by Muslim girls to be directed toward the outside world as much as the person walking in the rain under his umbrella is holding his umbrella  to direct the top of it toward the sky. 

34

continuing from the preceding post
If you want to count on a person things that reveal the religious affiliation despite not being intended for that purpose then clothes that do not cover the body could also fall in that category because one could know the religion of the person wearing those clothes from even just the color or tone of the skin. 
And what if a person gets recognize as a Muslim because of, for example, the change in his look and weight during the fasting of the Ramadan month? Would the cloth that do not cover that or are not baggy enough to create the illusion of him being bigger in size be also forbidden because they reveal his religious affiliation? And since one doesn't have to limit the thinking to existing religions, we can ask this question about a religion with fasting periods long enough to make such noticeable change more probable.
Moreover, even if we assume that the use of the word  "ostensiblement"  HERE  has nothing to do with intention and is merely about the clarity of the "manifestation" of religious affiliation with the worn attire, it still seems to better fit being about clarity stemming from the directness in the religious connection expressing the religious affiliation rather than the commonality of understanding the behaviour as resulting from that religious affiliation. At least one reason for that is the les élèves (the pupils/students) being made the subject in les élèves manifestent ostensiblement..(the pupils overtly/ostentatiously manifest..). Having the people inferring the religious affiliation to which a student belongs is not something done by the student. 

33

Despite how one may want to discuss how bad or good and the constitutionality of the law I am talking about in the preceding two posts, the reason for which I started writing is how something like a headscarf can be understood as a symbol then extended the talk about the other things mentioned when I found that. However HERE is what I found as the text of the law. And  guess what?  The word translated as "symbols" actually translates as "signs" in both the title and the text of the law. There is a huge difference between signs and symbols. So why did the media feel that much liberty in translating it that way? I don't know. 
Moreover, the translation of the page above seems to talk, in the body of the law,  about the pupils doing the action of showing the religious affiliation through the outfit not the outfit doing that, while leaving the door open for both interpretations in the title.
Theses two things seems to take away the arguments I made in the preceding posts except for the one about the passivity in the action.

    

32

continuing from the preceding post

The point about the use of clothes and garment for a purpose and that they have no value in themselves and therefore are not religious symbols apply even on clothes, like Abaya in the middle east, that are made specifically to serve the function of covering the body of a woman from being seen (hijab). 

For answering the garb that shows religious affiliation part, we say that if a girl uses a piece of garment as a headscarf or wear bigger size clothes and because of that she gets recognize as a Muslim it is the way those things were used that show the "religious affiliation" not the bigger clothes or the piece of garment themselves. If you look at a crescent or a cross or a yamaka by itself you can still see its religious connection. But what religious connection can you see in, for example, a piece of garment that was used as a headscarf when it is not being worn?                                                                                                                                                                                          

31

Now that I am more acquainted with how the type of reasoning courts use is not far from normal reasoning, I want to return back to something I heard before this familiarity and kept wondering about. It is related to the alleged applicability of the French law that forbids "conspicuous religious symbols" (LINK) in public schools on the headscarf warren by Muslim girls. Unless I am missing something here, how could that rule apply on that thing? The headscarf has a purpose. Its purpose is to prevent seeing the body of those girls by males not related to them. It has no value on its own and as much as there is no reasonable chance for being seen by men, wearing it or not doesn't matter religiously and you would see that nobody wears it. Nothing of that can be said about wearing a cross or a Yarmulke or a crescent. 
     

That was the argument against the interpretation of the law as reported in being targeting religious symbols. But the law is translated like this according to the link above. 

["Law #2004-228 of March 15, 2004, concerning, as an application of the principle of the separation of church and state, the wearing of symbols or garb which show religious affiliation in public primary and secondary schools"]
However, addressing the "garb" part as having a different purpose than the "symbols" part, one could still argue that it is not the intended purpose of a headscarf and any other body covering clothes to show religious affiliation but it shows that only passively and despite all the wishes for that not to happen. So if we want to interpret that part to include anything allowing the conclusion of belonging to a religious affiliation by external parties then God knows to how far it can extend to reach. 

30

continuing from the preceding post:

Actually, the "French movie" is considered from Belgium but the main character was nominated for best actress here and in France through participating in the best foreign film category which I don't think is that common. 

However it is not like I am having much easier time fitting the French winner for best actress with my evaluation. That seems to support even more my understanding about how I am messed up inside in evaluating or seeing what connect only to the self. 

It is still would be interesting to see what would be the difference from current results if we switch the nominated movies between, for example, France and here.

29

I am struggling hard to see how the winner of best actress in Oscar 2015 was neither the gone girl in "Gone Girl" or the main character in the French movie "Two Days One Night". Are there sufficient amount of real critiques to the selection of that entity or is it like a royal decree? And why is it kept a secret how much voting does each nominee get?

28

I never thought that one day I would see what could suggests confusing those two. Expressions like "Saying it like it is" are about following belief not desire. They apply on the person as much as he puts the facts above himself. Otherwise, savagery would be the ultimate aim for the purpose.

Also because he fakes it, there is also a problem for that guy for not really meaning the bad things he says or said. If that sound confusing, think about someone making the claim that he, for no reason, attacked a crowd of a thousand men and killed them all with his bare hands. You may not like that he is lying about that despite that you also don't like it to be true.  

   

27

What is with all that disturbing protesting to Trump rallies? Don't those people realize how bad it is to stand against the freedom of speech? 

26

I just want to know, when Sanders says that Hillary supported NAFTA, what kind of support he is referring to? Because, she was not in any part of the government during that time. Or is it that one presidential contender side is counting mere opinions on the other as if it was in the position of authority while the later lacks the capacity to point that out or do the same to that side? However, it still apparently was good enough not to miss being part of the general corruption in support of the corruption guy.   

25

I just heard on a TV news that some "fact checking" entity claims that the effect of NAFTA was "negligible". Unless that was about a special case or a different thing, are you kidding me? I took Ross Perot's point on it and was speaking against it from the beginning. I saw and very clearly experienced what makes it unavoidable to face that it caused a huge effect in taking away manufacturing and production jobs everywhere in the country. I experienced that so deeply and for so long that it is not easy for me to see the argument from the other side not being merely politically motivated.

24

Not all things are easier in a democracy. In Saddam's Iraq no outsider had anything on me because I was oppressed and had no choice in how the government behaves inside or out. But having a democratic system is like being allowed to drive a car, you add not only the capability to do it the way you want but also the responsibility associated with that. It is sad to see how far this is from being given sufficient attention in the elections especially that of the executive power. I don't want to just overpower the other. I want the leader who as much as possible would stand for justice and democracy around the world.        

23 (Lead Vs. soluble fiber)

OK, it may not be that bad, but the later seems to also dangerously accumulate in the body. I used to sometimes concentrate for periods on eating too much oatmeal which messes my digestive system for some time. Then I stop eating it and everything return to normal within couple of days. So, I thought if I can tolerate that then I could easily tolerate the little amount that comes with consuming one (two ground) table spoon of Flax Seeds, right? WRONG. It lasted probably a month or two then even after suspending my consumption of it the situation became like my digestive system had submitted its resignation letter and I have been spending the last two weeks trying to make it reconsider. I think, dealing with it like a radioactive material, I still can tolerate close to one table spoon daily but with no joking around exceeding that amount not even by merely trying to shake the excess off.

22

So Justice Scalia died and left the rest in the court equally split on my case and the Senate want to let the court on even number like this for the new president to fill the vacancy? 

You think this situation is difficult? This is nothing compared to a problem I heard about when I was a child. A rooster laid an egg exactly on the top of the fence between your neighbor's house and yours. To whom does the egg belong? 

21

continuing from post 20

Although I think it is not real, and may be fun, encouraging the psychopathy of this guy by making him take people like objects for his service like this is not good for his sickness. Before this, it was an abhorrent thing to see him use news about someone who a short while ago had really lost his son to cancer to give manipulating signs for his purpose.  

20

continuing from post 19

It is fun to see Supreme or other Federal courts judge selection compete on young talents like a modeling agency.

While physical ability diminish with aging I think that most of the people working intellectual jobs like this would at old age beat their earlier thinking capability .

By the way, did Justice Scalia really die? Lets see... Does Justice Breyer feel haunted yet?      

19

I don't know if judges in this country, especially those selected for the highest court are chosen to be ready for the Olympics or counted on to win some other athletic events? I am asking this because I found out lately that the oldest judge approved for that court was 61 years old. The point should be that one should not avoid a young candidate just because of his age not that an older candidate should be avoided because of his age. Why would one chooses to ignore the added advantage of experience and having a richer history for evaluation?

18( Flax Seed 3)

There is another big effect I noticed that is most probably attributable to my consumption of ground Flax Seed. You know that tingling feeling and heaviness in your foot that happens just after, for example, you sat for too long on it or on the toilet seat? I used to drag my foot like an external object for some time when that happen. Now within much shorter time the feeling in my feet return to normal.

I am not a medical professional but this and the previous effects I mentioned seems to support that plant Omega 3 works wonder on the expansion or elasticity of blood vessels.

17

I am not a big fan of boxing, let alone being an expert in it. However I have been wondering since watching some of Mike Tyson's fights when they were aired about the judging  of those fights. To this day I have not seen a fighting match in which the referee allows one party to attach himself to the other and does not break away the two like this in any other boxing match. Was there something I couldn't understand or was it that the entire nation watched something unjust like that and took it as if there was nothing wrong with it just because they did not like the guy at the time?

   

16

One thing that takes one back to the concern about groundless generalization I spoke about earlier in connection with the guy currently leading the Republicans is his reference to that story related to the husband of a rival woman on the other side. It keeps one wondering did the baseless generalization of that guy blinded him to the level of generalizing to the other person a thing that was the most harming to him in the first place like this just because of the association between the two? Who would have thought that a woman sticking with her husband despite a thing like that would be unexplainably taken as a bad thing against her like this?

Shouldn't things said make more sense than that?

   

15

One question I could ask any person seeking the presidency position is whom he/she would pick to fill a judicial vacancy including a sudden one and based on that I not only take a look at that issue but also help reflect back  a light on the person as a whole. The answers are required to have actual names or specific selection strategy as much as possible.

One version of this question could come in the form of limiting the responder to only persons he already know.  

14:(Flax Seed 2)

It seems that because of the Ground Flax Seeds I also no longer feel that sudden drowsiness, or whatever you call it, that I used to sometimes feel when I suddenly stand.

By the way, I noticed couple of days ago that two ground table spoons of Flax Seeds are counted as one of the whole.     

+13: Could it be more embarrassing?

It is very hard not to be seen as shame and disgrace to have people HERE spend two years demanding something as essential as WATER like it has been the situation in Flint Michigan.

Also, even assuming you cant correct problems like this, shouldn't you at least warren and inform people who are counting on the government not to betray them?

+12 (Flax Seed)

Are there some missing on or have not heard about the potential benefit of Flax Seed (ground)? After trying it I now even wonder why would anyone waste any amount of his/her body toleration for soluble fiber on oatmeal. 

I used to feel a headache for a little while during the day if I have a salty meal for breakfast. It does not even have to be very salty. Actually, it became more probable to me later that even serial causes me a headache because of its sodium content but it was less noticeable because of lower duration and intensity. Even with the breathless exercising I was doing the situation seemed to be only minorly improved.

Now, with Flax Seed, what seemed like very hard to change thing, within a very short period, became no longer that and I probably can consume three times the salt or more without feeling anything later. I don't remember any food affecting me like this before. It was like a medicine. 

To give it a better chance of working, I prefer not to cook it at all. I also try to grind on the go.    

11

About generality talk, first of all, it should not alter that ultimately everybody should be held responsible only for what he/she did not what anyone else did. Second, it is, like everything else, also depends on the level of honesty and how much the person restrict himself by the facts. In other words, not all generality talk created equal. For example when that guy beats his drums on Muslims here and gives them all hard time without basing his claims on signs like a sufficient level of support and connections within the group or a benefit (like maintaining the advantage of a power and control they have) through these actions then his talk can hardly be seen as having more value than the barking of a dog.

He even showed what could very strongly suggests his willingness to ignore facts when he was confronted with how much he could be wrong in claiming that Muslims celebrated in a group in New Jersey after 9/11 and he refused to abandon his claim. Funny how the media were reporting that as if it is a sign of a good strength. You could confuse "Hamas" with "hummus", "baba ganoush" and all Arab associated food names and still that may not come even anywhere to eclipse your denial of facts in front of you and insisting on a mistake.

On the other hand, the argument, for example, that why should everyone be inspected in the airport given that Arab Muslims did 9/11 or the statement that "Muslims attacked us in 9/11" despite being not pleasurable thing to me as an Arab Muslim, are built on a ground with a fact (The problem however, for the first is how much it conflicts with laws and an already chosen policy path and how much it could encourage unwarranted discrimination in other things while the problem with that statement is how much it could misleadingly sound as if Muslims came as a group attacked in 9/11 and that is why it is not the same as saying those who attacked on 9/11 were Muslims).