One thing that takes one back to the concern about groundless generalization I spoke about earlier in connection with the guy currently leading the Republicans is his reference to that story related to the husband of a rival woman on the other side. It keeps one wondering did the baseless generalization of that guy blinded him to the level of generalizing to the other person a thing that was the most harming to him in the first place like this just because of the association between the two? Who would have thought that a woman sticking with her husband despite a thing like that would be unexplainably taken as a bad thing against her like this?
Shouldn't things said make more sense than that?
No comments:
Post a Comment