17

I am not a big fan of boxing, let alone being an expert in it. However I have been wondering since watching some of Mike Tyson's fights when they were aired about the judging  of those fights. To this day I have not seen a fighting match in which the referee allows one party to attach himself to the other and does not break away the two like this in any other boxing match. Was there something I couldn't understand or was it that the entire nation watched something unjust like that and took it as if there was nothing wrong with it just because they did not like the guy at the time?

   

16

One thing that takes one back to the concern about groundless generalization I spoke about earlier in connection with the guy currently leading the Republicans is his reference to that story related to the husband of a rival woman on the other side. It keeps one wondering did the baseless generalization of that guy blinded him to the level of generalizing to the other person a thing that was the most harming to him in the first place like this just because of the association between the two? Who would have thought that a woman sticking with her husband despite a thing like that would be unexplainably taken as a bad thing against her like this?

Shouldn't things said make more sense than that?

   

15

One question I could ask any person seeking the presidency position is whom he/she would pick to fill a judicial vacancy including a sudden one and based on that I not only take a look at that issue but also help reflect back  a light on the person as a whole. The answers are required to have actual names or specific selection strategy as much as possible.

One version of this question could come in the form of limiting the responder to only persons he already know.  

14:(Flax Seed 2)

It seems that because of the Ground Flax Seeds I also no longer feel that sudden drowsiness, or whatever you call it, that I used to sometimes feel when I suddenly stand.

By the way, I noticed couple of days ago that two ground table spoons of Flax Seeds are counted as one of the whole.     

+13: Could it be more embarrassing?

It is very hard not to be seen as shame and disgrace to have people HERE spend two years demanding something as essential as WATER like it has been the situation in Flint Michigan.

Also, even assuming you cant correct problems like this, shouldn't you at least warren and inform people who are counting on the government not to betray them?

+12 (Flax Seed)

Are there some missing on or have not heard about the potential benefit of Flax Seed (ground)? After trying it I now even wonder why would anyone waste any amount of his/her body toleration for soluble fiber on oatmeal. 

I used to feel a headache for a little while during the day if I have a salty meal for breakfast. It does not even have to be very salty. Actually, it became more probable to me later that even serial causes me a headache because of its sodium content but it was less noticeable because of lower duration and intensity. Even with the breathless exercising I was doing the situation seemed to be only minorly improved.

Now, with Flax Seed, what seemed like very hard to change thing, within a very short period, became no longer that and I probably can consume three times the salt or more without feeling anything later. I don't remember any food affecting me like this before. It was like a medicine. 

To give it a better chance of working, I prefer not to cook it at all. I also try to grind on the go.    

11

About generality talk, first of all, it should not alter that ultimately everybody should be held responsible only for what he/she did not what anyone else did. Second, it is, like everything else, also depends on the level of honesty and how much the person restrict himself by the facts. In other words, not all generality talk created equal. For example when that guy beats his drums on Muslims here and gives them all hard time without basing his claims on signs like a sufficient level of support and connections within the group or a benefit (like maintaining the advantage of a power and control they have) through these actions then his talk can hardly be seen as having more value than the barking of a dog.

He even showed what could very strongly suggests his willingness to ignore facts when he was confronted with how much he could be wrong in claiming that Muslims celebrated in a group in New Jersey after 9/11 and he refused to abandon his claim. Funny how the media were reporting that as if it is a sign of a good strength. You could confuse "Hamas" with "hummus", "baba ganoush" and all Arab associated food names and still that may not come even anywhere to eclipse your denial of facts in front of you and insisting on a mistake.

On the other hand, the argument, for example, that why should everyone be inspected in the airport given that Arab Muslims did 9/11 or the statement that "Muslims attacked us in 9/11" despite being not pleasurable thing to me as an Arab Muslim, are built on a ground with a fact (The problem however, for the first is how much it conflicts with laws and an already chosen policy path and how much it could encourage unwarranted discrimination in other things while the problem with that statement is how much it could misleadingly sound as if Muslims came as a group attacked in 9/11 and that is why it is not the same as saying those who attacked on 9/11 were Muslims).