56

continuing from post 54

I don't remember any of those throwing salt and pepper from high cooking shows coming even close to give something like the method in that link for frying eggplants, which I was looking for knowing how to do, or anything similar in benefit to me. Following the instructions there and paying special attention to the degree of heat and the amount of oil in the skillet may make one fry eggplants like a professional. I used to ignore the importance of the amount of oil until I realized how it could be that both the degree of heat and the amount of heat affect how fast the whole surface of the food in the skillet can reach the required change and therefore how much absorption of oil can happen during that time.

It seems that incorporating induction cooking in the frying process could improve it by not only preventing unnecessary absorption of oil but also preserving as much as possible the quality of an oil from unnecessary higher heat with its controlled temperature. I intend to combine the use of induction cooking with the use of extra virgin olive oil for frying.

55

Also about eggplants. This may be like telling people in other countries that you can boil eggs but here it may be needed. If you think fried eggplants taste good try this simple added step and see the difference it makes. Just simmer the fried eggplants with some water and, for example, a table spoon of oil and some seasoning if you prefer, like turmeric or curry, until the water dries to your satisfaction. That could be served with salad and/or yogurt and bread. 

54

This woman is my pick for the president position if THIS works. Because if you defeat the eggplants absorption of oil when fried no enemy can stand a chance.

53

By the way, how did Justice Scalia die? If it was something like a brain clot, I felt developing the same thing the few times I heard Justice Breyer's talk over the internet, trying to figure out his point. 

52

They talk about the Supreme Court lacks being of nine votes. Do you mean that Justices Scalia and Thomas were counted as two?

51

If anyone wonders why I use two Ids for posting the answer is that did not happen by choice. The one here was the only one but Google Plus messed up the things for me. 

50

I think that the baby and especially the newborn or infant may feel danger from anything that to him doesn't look sufficiently under the control of the parent. So if a parent decides to bring, for example, a cat to the baby it would make a big difference keeping the cat held by the parent instead of letting it roam freely around the baby. 

48

So now it appears there is this thing of throwing a baby in water in order to teach it how to float. How sure is it that we are not witnessing outrageous craziness being justified? Why the responsibility of the parents being shifted to the baby and for, to say the least, such a risky trade off? The younger the baby is the more irreversible the psychological damage that happen to it if it comprehend or feel a danger to its existence. I once saw on TV a mother letting a cat near her baby, which looked at least somewhat uncomfortable, and wondered what internal damage that could lead, let alone leaving it to itself to face surviving the danger of drowning in water. The protection of parents to their baby is not just from the danger but also from the feeling of danger. I remember reading a professional in the field giving example about how even a buzzing wasp in the room where the baby is could cause a psychotic damage in that regard. I think that, in addition to other things, even a little bit look of discomfort or disconcert on the baby should never be ignored as a signal that a baby is sensing danger in its environment.          

47

When the court in Florida sent me a photocopy of the sealed (stamped) summons I wondered how could that be allowed. With the one in New York, on the other hand, it appears that it was not part of its action against my case that it doesn't even send the plaintiff a photocopy of a sealed summons but a general practice. I don't know what kind of interpretation to FRCP Rule 4 allows that? If a court follow the law like that what would you expect from the ordinary person? Do those courts need more things dependent on their judgments that they crave the authority on something that much sitting on the borderline between the legislative and judicial authority like the first initiation of a law suit?

RULE 4  states that a summon "must" contain a seal and the clerk's signature? Do you see in that any possible interpretation that it could carry only the photocopy for those things, let alone the absences of a seal altogether? Neither it seems that Rule 1 gives a free pass for doing that through its application of justice, speed and inexpensiveness in the implementation of the rules.

The only seal the one in New York send is on one summons that the defendant never see and is only there to be returned to the court with proof of service. As if when the corresponding part of Rule 4 was made the main concern was how to make the summons in a way that shows its authenticity to the court that issued it in case it forgot and has no record of its own actions.  

  

  

46

Continuing from post 43

Actually, regarding the issue of guns and second amendment specifically, for all the judges in that court without exception, I in fact wish that whatever they do and did in my situation with the corruption guy here, they would have done no less had I not took the stand I took in that issue. 

45

continuing from the receding post 

Although having all those oils seem to change color more like instantaneous reaction and not in varying levels could suggests that what I described may not be a direct result to how much those oils were damaged. 

One  could heat the extra virgin olive oil and see if it will react similar to those other oils when swished in the mouth later. That still may not resolve the issue even for just the heating effect because there seems to be some disagreement on how much heat extra virgin olive oil can take.