I just want to know, are there really people complaining about a law that requires picture ID for voting? How hard is it to do that? That is especially true if there is a long enough period for early voting that can be used if one fears he could forget in the main day of voting. It seems a very valid requirement and I wonder what that court argued against it. Why would one want a privileged treatment for something he can do that easily and with that gives the excuse for a privilege against him in a more serious thing? Those suing for such things remind me when a news man told the former president or his press secretary before the war in Afghanistan that Muslims (or some Muslims) think (or say or said) only God can give "Ultimate Justice" (or something like that) and apparently because of that made the white house changed the name to "Enduring Freedom".
